EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES PHYSICIANS ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Thursday, May 18, 2006
Members Present:
Michael Curtis
Wade Woelfle
Mark Schultz
Tom Brazelton
Suzanne Martens
Halim Hennes
Jason Liu
Charles Cady
Mark Westfall
Members Excused:
None
1.0.
Introductions &
Welcome - Charles Cady
Dr.
Cady welcomed the committee and brought the meeting to order at 10:00 AM
EMS
Office Staff: Dan Williams, Keith Wesley
Guests:
None
2.0.
Approval of January 12,
2006 minutes – All
Motion by Halim Hennes, second by Jason Liu to approve
the minutes from the January 12, 2006 meeting. Motion Carried.
2.1.
Note: March
meeting cancelled due to weather
3.0.
New Business
3.1.
Medical Director
Evaluation Tool
REPORT CARD
Questions
on whether or not to further review the EMS report card that provides focus on
Medical Direction and use it to assist in the development of Medical Director
training and evaluation. Pac felt that input from the Systems Management committee
and their review and relevance to the EMS Service component of the Report Card
should also take place to determine how it could be used by EMS services.
Discussion
was held on potential format and delivery methods.
It
was decided to bring the report card back and circulate to the group to decide
where to go next.
MEDICAL DIRECTOR EVALUATION TOOL
Look
at the format from the report card to develop an evaluation tool that is
similar in design to EMS Report Card.
It
was decided that the evaluation tool needed to be developed from the Medical
Director Contract exhibit 1 sections 1.2.3 A-O to establish the basic areas to
be evaluated that were identified as performance criteria from the State MD
contract. A scoring criterion that
demonstrates a method for evaluation and improvement needs to be created that
reflects the performance criteria.
It
was discussed that all associated groups that work in support with the EMS
office and the State Medical Director be part of the evaluation process. It was
noted that the only group that has official responsibilities to evaluate the
position is PAC and evaluation should be limited to that committee. The EMS
office can solicit other comments as needed to determine overall EMS
satisfaction with the position.
Asked
everyone to provide 5 sample questions to be used to develop the tool.
We developed the following list of those that we
definitely need feedback from. It was
felt that we would invite feedback from anyone including professional
organization and individuals. There was
concern that feedback from individuals may be biased and difficult to quantify,
but this would be considered when evaluating all feedback.
EMS
Office Staff
EMSC
EMS
Medical Directors
EMS
Board
STAC
Develop
tool so that everyone that has some sort of interaction is given the
opportunity to provide the feedback.
3.2.
Inter-facility Transport
Guidelines.
The
committee discussed the Inter-facility Transport Guidelines that are
essentially completed. Dan advised the committee that NHTSA had just released
their version of an Inter-facility Transport Guideline and he and Dr. Wesley
were doing a quick review to determine if anything was substantially different
from our document to that one. It should take a couple of weeks and then if needed
the Wisconsin document will be revised and sent out in early July.
3.3.
Standardized state
protocols
1.
Mandated State protocols will not be an attainable
goal.
2.
Current minimal State protocols need to be revised and
made available to services.
3.
Basic level scopes of practice should be used as the
bases for developing proper protocols.
4.
Develop a list of what should be in a protocol and a
list of what protocols you should have.
5.
Develop a
standardized format and determine a date in the future for possibly mandating
the selected format. This work should be completed by years end and a possible
compliance date would be July 1, 2008.
3.4.
Clarify Sept meeting at
PSOW. PSOW will be held September 13-14-15, 2006. Pac and medical
directors meeting would be on Wednesday 9-13-06. The meeting will be at the
Paper Valley in Appleton.
4.0.
Old Business
4.1.
Advanced Airway QA Tool
The
revised form was presented and approved by PAC and will go to state EMS office
for form number and implementation use and criteria by EMS office.
4.2.
Excited Delirium
Pilot/Protocols
Dr.
Curtis introduced the thought that Geodon could be considered as a possible
medication instead of Ketamine as an approved medication for the paramedic to
use as a medication. Because this medication is not in the Paramedic curriculum
and all of the standard medications are based on what is taught in the initial
EMT-Paramedic program proof of education, protocol for use and Medical Director
approval would be needed as well as a revised service operational plan.
Motion by Curtis, second by Westfall to
allow paramedic services to use Geodon for agitated and combative patients age
12 years of age and older and to be added to the Paramedic medication list with
appropriate training. Motion carried.
4.3.
Inter-facility transport
guidelines
This
topic was covered previously.
4.4.
CPAP Pilot
Has
been approved and all services have been notified and set the training material
and protocols.
Dr.
Westfall presented preliminary data from the pilot project.
4.5.
Medical Director’s
Course
1.
Current power point should be made available on
request.
2.
Develop a revised narrated version to be completed by
September.
3.
Determine a sponsoring agent such as State Medical
Society. Or independent associations.
4.
Explore the possibility of developing an EMS association.
5.0.
Board Meeting Report.
Dan updated the committee on recent EMS Advisory Board activities.
6.0.
EMSC Report—Dr.
Brazelton
1.
Meeting with Dennis Tomczyk on assessing pediatric capabilities in Wisconsin as
part of an expert panel on pediatric issues was very productive and is an
ongoing effort to better utilized resources and understanding of pediatric
needs in EMS.
2.
Child alert is being reviewed in parallel with the Minnesota’s program.
7.0.
Medical Director Report
–Dr. Wesley
1.
Various issues were discussed as part of the meeting.
2.
Dr. Wesley will have his first quarterly report prior
to next meeting.
New Business.
1.
Dan presented a request from Chippewa Falls Fire Dept. requesting a waiver
request to allow them to transport patients with ventilators. They are a
Intermediate service and the scope of practice does not allow for this level of
practice. PAC members overwhelmingly agreed that an intermediate service cannot
independently transport a patient on a vent as it is beyond their scope of
practice, but any service can transport a vented patient as long as the usual
vent operator (nurse, family, or caregiver who is normally responsible for the
vent at home or facility) accompanies the patient. Since another service in the area can provide this service within
their scope, a waiver was not deemed necessary.
8.0.
Next Meeting: Thursday, July 20, 2006 Medical Society
8.1.
Proposed agenda items
Meeting
adjourned at 2:30 PM