Emergency Medical Services Board Meeting
April 6, 2005
Board Members present: Bureau Staff:
Tracy
Aldrich Meg
Taylor
Steve
Bane Bruce
Gordon
Brenda
Fellenz Dan
Williams
Troy
Haase Ann
Moses
Cal Lintz Marianne Peck
Ken Johnson
Steve
Teale
Travis
Teesch
Gloria Wall
Joe Covelli
Board
Members Excused:
Gloria Murawsky
Others
in Attendance: Representing:
Barb Kuska Beloit Memorial Hospital
Ann Peggs PFFW
Allen Hefter PFFW
Todd Van Langen West Bend Fire Dept.
Jan Beyer UW EMS Program
Jennifer Roman Madison Fire Dept.
Joseph Immermann Southwest RTAC, Coordinator
Don Kimlicka Sparta Area Ambulance
Judy Jones Luther – Eau Claire
Vickkie
Zietlow MidState
technical College
Gary Leyer Gateway Technical College
Fred
Hornby Bell
Ambulance
Pat
Padjen UW
EMS Program
Steve
Pilsner Wausau
Fire Department
Suzanne
Martens Sheboygan
Co EMS
Mary
Austin Monroe
Clinic
Tracy
Froiland Theda
Care/Fox Valley
Larry
Knuth Paratech
Ambulance
Cheryl
Glomp St.
Mary’s Hospital
Tom
Brazelton UW
Hospital
Jerry
Miller Life
Quest Billing
Charles
Cady Physicians
Advisory Committee
Jim
Brian Marinette
County Rescue Association
Beth
Natter Mercy
Hospital – Janesville
Bob
Nack Fox
Valley RTAC Coordinator
Ted
Tautges Wausau
Fire Dept.
Tom
Fennell Mayo
Medical Transport
Jim
Swan Divine
Savior Healthcare
Chair,
Steve Bane called the meeting to order at 10:00 AM at the Crowne Plaza,
Madison. Steve asked everyone in
attendance on the Board and the audience to introduce him or herself.
Motion by Teesch, seconded
by Haase to
approve the February 2005 Board minutes. Motion
carried.
The Standing Committees gave their reports. Included in each standing committee report was a report from any ad hoc committees that are assigned to the standing committee.
1.
The
main committee did not meet.
EMS
Partners ad hoc: Cal Lintz, committee chair
stated that the committee reviewed the following issues:
a.
Web
based training system discussion. The committee discussed the issues
surrounding the web based changes being proposed regarding education and
relicensure period. The education program development can begin but can not be
implemented until the process rules are established. The intent is for the
Technical College system to be on the front end of the process to be able to
provide this type of education within the current system.
b.
The
committee has decided that they should maintain the current meeting frequency,
which seems to be meeting the intended goals and tasks that the committee was intended
to deal with.
Steve Teale reported on behalf of the committee:
1. Steve reported on the progress of the review of the basic EMT curriculum. Steve stated that the group was moving to a practice based approach to training. The committee provided an analysis of the major modules of the course. The first two units are completely done and are moving forward with the completion and time line. Time line will not allow for a fall roll out in 2006. The intent would be to implement in May of 2007. Steve also handed out the template for how the curriculum will be laid out.
Don Hunjadi reported on the committee meeting, which
included:
1.
The
main discussion centered on the topic of the Basic EMT Refresher and
relicensure requirements. The committee has previously been discussing and
planning with regards to the length and quality of training that is needed as
well as the length of time for re-licensure. Several committee members
suggested that a four (4) year re-licensure period should be looked at. The
committee stated that many formats for education need to be examined, such as,
virtual classrooms, web based programs, conferences, etc. It was the consensus
that the education can and should be exciting and renewed with a variety of
educational formats. A committee was put in place to develop the rules for how
the entire process on procedure and makeup so that the education programs will
have a template for how to access and work within the proposed system. The
committee decided to meet again on May 3, 2005 at 1:00 PM in Wautoma, WI at the
LifeQuest Billing office.
2.
The proposed National Scope of Practice Draft 2.0 has been
updated from the 1.0 draft and is available. The original National EMS Scope of
Practice Model was of great concern for many people nationally. The scope
committee received many, many letters of concern and protest to the product.
They also received many letters of support to certain aspects of the draft. It
would appear that the scope committee is now moving to minimal criteria as
opposed to maximum criteria. More information will be made available as it is
released. The Committee needs to complete another evaluation and response
regarding Draft 2.0 and send it out in the time period given to respond.
SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT.
3. The Systems committee is also continuing its work on inclusion and exclusion transport criteria for stand alone emergency departments. Part of the document will address the main issues surround the delivery of patients to locations other than designated hospital emergency departments. The committee will develop a template for this purpose than can be used in the event that another situation like this comes up and can be forwarded to the appropriate EMS service at the time.
CQI
Ken Johnson reported that the
committee has begun to receive feedback on the CQI templates and are preparing
responses.
The committee needs to answer
the question as to what direction they should move toward as the next phase of
the project. The changes in the Stroke patient care protocols may be a good
area to provide education back to the EMS services so that the patients can be
cared for in a positive way. The committee needs to determine how they will use
the information and how the patient care can be changed.
The committee will develop a
packet of information that will be available to services that will better
define the entire process.
The committee feels that there
will be natural move into the information enhancement committee as the data
management system starts to take shape. It will be quite a while before that
transition can take place however. The committee needs to continue to move
forward so that the momentum that has been built is not lost while waiting for
the data system.
Disaster The committee is
reviewing and working on the following:
1.
Suzanne Martens presented the first-in
document for review as an information piece for the WEEPP. A document was
settled on and will be provided for approval.
Motion by Johnson, to accept the
document by exception with a 15-day period to respond to the department with
any concerns. Second, Lintz. Motion carried.
Gloria Wall
reported on the following committee meeting actions.
1.
The committee is identifying the role that
they need to play. There is a better understanding that a pro-active approach
is taken to educate and understand the working relationships that could and
should be considered.
2.
The committee also needs to identify &
strengthen the relationship between Public Health and EMS. EMS office is
available to attend the regional meetings to educate the regions on the linking
roles of EMS and Public Health agencies.
3.
LEPC’s (Local Emergency Planning
Committee’s) may be the link to getting all of the players to the table for a
common platform with regards to disaster linkages between Public Health and
EMS.
The committee worked to
outline the item that they felt would be the backbone needs of whatever Data
Management system/program that would be eventually decided upon. The committee
discussed the following.
1.
The committee developed a three-page document on the essential
components of what should be part of a system for the development of an RFP. Motion by Haase, Second Teesch, to approve the document developed by the
committee and to be used in the development of the Ambulance Run data
management RFP. The motion is by exception with a 15-day period to send any
further comments to EMS office (Dan Williams). Motion carried.
2.
The
committee will then move toward the development of RFP evaluation criteria.
Because of the short time frame we are now working under another meeting has
been scheduled for May 3, 2005, to be held in Wautoma, WI at the LifeQuest
Billing office
Dr. Tom Brazelton reported that a collaboration group was being established to bring all of the various EMS groups together to better integrate our processes and procedures to assure that we don’t have anyone left out. The first organizational meeting was held today with representatives from EMSC, EMS Advisory Board, EMS Office Staff, State Trauma Coordinator. The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, June 1, 2005 after the next STAC meeting.
Interfacility transport guidelines are being re-worked to bring them up to date with current medications and practices. It is anticipated that the review will be complete within the next 4 – 6 months.
The Medical Directors course is in final stages of
refinement and about ready to be placed on a State supported site. Further
enhancement has been discussed, but the current plan is to get the course
operational and then move for improved enhancements at a later date.
Medical
Director Report. The Medical Directed discussed several areas that he was currently
working on.
Dan advised the Board that the plan had been approved at the last Board meeting and the current task was the educational component of the WEEPP. Cathy Etter from the EMS office has worked with the EMS Alliance to develop a training tool to distributed to EMS services through the Regional RTAC’s. The RTAC’s will receive train the trainer, training which will allow them to actively involved in moving the plan and the corresponding training forward.
It was noted that the Prevention Block Grant funding in the Federal budget has a zero budget. The impact on the State EMS office would be significant if this remains. Approximately one half of the EMS office staff positions are funding by this grant. Further the Federal Trauma system and EMS for children are also zero budgets.
2. National Registry Exam Changes. Dan Williams
advised the Board that he attended a meeting St. Louis sponsored by the
National Registry where they rolled out the first information regarding their
proposed move to an all computer based testing system. The system will be
effective January 1, 2007. The purpose of the meeting was to introduce the
reasoning behind the change and to solicit input from State EMS Directors from
around the country. The discussions were centered on Costs, Access to testing
sites and Logistics. There will be much more discussion in the future on all of
these issues as the process moves forward. Dan did advise the Board that there
will be a significant increase in the cost of the written exam. The 1st
Responder exam will be $65.00; EMT basic will be $70.00; EMT – Intermediate
will be $100.00 and the Paramedic exam will be $110.00.
Agenda item
# 8 Other Board Related Issues.
A discussion was held regarding the next Board
retreat. Historically the retreat was held the week of June. That was prior to
the change to a regular June Board meeting. It was the feeling of the current
Board members that it may be better to allow for any new Board members that may
be appointed to attend a few regular Board meetings. There would be two regular
meetings prior to the retreat that way they would get a feel for what is going
on before having to discuss and plan for what is needed for the future. It was
decided to start looking into a retreat for possibly September 12 & 13,
2005. Dan will check on meeting location availability and will keep the Board
advised.
Agenda item #11 Adjournment.
Motion by Lintz, second by,
Johnson to adjourn. Meeting adjourned at 11:59 AM.